200) && (this.width >= this.height) ? 200: true); max-height: 200px; height: expression((this.height > 200) && (this.height >= this.width) ? 200: true); border: none;’/>Scientists widely agree that human activity is the main driver of global warming, and that we have to radically reduce greenhouse gas emissions to avoid its worst impacts. But when it comes to how we can best slash emissions, some scientists are fiercely at odds. A scholarly brawl broke out this week after energy experts ripped apart a widely cited 2015 study that found the U.S. economy could affordably run on 100-percent renewable energy by midcentury. SEE ALSO: Climate change efforts still ‘n. show all text
posted by friends:
(2)
(2)
@mashable: An intense scientific squabble has broken out re: the future of clean energy in the U.S. on.mash.to/2sW7ydF
@KevinJDonaldson: #Mashable Can the U.S. run only on wind, water, and solar power? Scientists disagree. ht.ly/HK6P50cjpQn
@mashable: Can wind, solar and hydro alone power the entire US? Scientists disagree. on.mash.to/2ttMFE9
posted by followers of the list:
(0)
(0)
Vía All News on ‘The Twitter Times: Muzaffar69/corpgov’ http://ift.tt/2tttIRP
200) && (this.width >= this.height) ? 200: true); max-height: 200px; height: expression((this.height > 200) && (this.height >= this.width) ? 200: true); border: none;’/>
