The “Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine” Survives to Perplex Corporate Boards

http://bit.ly/1F0hYKk

corpgov.law.harvard.edu

Posted by Michael W. Peregrine, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, on Wednesday, July 5, 2017 Editor’s Note: Michael W. Peregrine is a partner at McDermott Will & Emery LLP. This post is based on an article by Mr. Peregrine; his views do not necessarily reflect the views of McDermott Will & Emery or its clients. Joshua T. Buchman, Rebecca Martin and Ryan Marcus assisted in the preparation of this post. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to deny the petition for a writ of certiorari in U.S. v DeCoster..  show all text

posted by friends:
 (3)

@oceg: The “Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine” Survives to Perplex Corporate Boards http://bit.ly/2tMuUmb; via @HarvardCorpGov #corpgov

05.07.2017 15.20.18

@edytadorenbos: The “Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine†Survives to Perplex Corporate Boards lnkd.in/g_W6eiR

05.07.2017 15.00.29

@ProfPadfield: "continued lack of clarity in the application of the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine" http://bit.ly/2tMuUmb; #corpgov

05.07.2017 14.00.01

posted by followers of the list:
 (0)

Vía All News on ‘The Twitter Times: Muzaffar69/corpgov’ http://bit.ly/2sN07kR