The CNN shills were besides themselves last night over a recent Trump speech. The details of his oratory presentation are meaningless. My question to you, the lifetime democrat is this: is the media’s coverage of President Trump helpful and appropriate?
I suppose you’d think that I’m against fervent criticism of the President. But you’d be wrong. As a point in fact, I think it’s necessary for the media to examine every fucking thing the people in power does, including the people who they love — like Obama and John Podesta. I get why conservatards are livid with the media — given the fact that Obama got a pass for 8 years.
Think about it. If the media was in fucking war mode with every god damned politician, lobbyist, judge, President and anyone of influence, the world would be a better place. But when the media only goes against those who are ideologically opposite from their worldview, they lose all credibility as an objective source for news and information.
That’s the point.
Although small, we don’t shill for anyone, in any party, and will report on any news item that is wrong for the ordinary egg cracking folks.
Here’s Paris Dennard dressing down the CNN panel, and especially Paul Begala, for their disgraceful coverage of the President.
I think we need more disgraceful people on the air and in print. We don’t need sycophants. I say, stock the media with people who don’t give a fuck and let it all burn.
The post Is the Media’s Coverage of Trump Fair? appeared first on Trading with The Fly.
May 01, 2017 at 01:13AM
from Dr. Fly
No comments:
Post a Comment